Post by account_disabled on Mar 13, 2024 22:32:31 GMT -5
However, the High Court has dismissed said appeal in application of the Montreal Convention, in which there is a regime of unlimited liability in the event of death or injury of an air transport passenger .Likewise, the annex that Regulation (EC) No. 889/2022 of the European Parliament and of the Council, of May 13, 2002, adds to Regulation (EC) No. 2027/97 of the Council, of October 9, 1997, on the liability of airlines in the event of an accident, establishes that “there is no economic limit set for liability in the event of injury or death of the passenger . ”An elderly man is found guilty of killing the thief who attacked him: the keys to self-defense.
Self-defense requires that an illegitimate aggression occurs, that there is no provocation on the part of the victim and that the means used are proportional.(Photo: Archive)Apopular jury has found an 83-year-old DJ USA man guilty of murder for killing one of the two people who attacked his home and forced him to rob him . Guilt has been determined after long deliberation and with a narrow majority. At the same time, the jury court, by a large majority, has been in favor of requesting a pardon for the person responsible for the homicide . While waiting for the sentence to be handed down by the president of the court, there has been debate about the scope of self-defense or insurmountable fear , given the particular circumstances of the case.
It should be remembered that a crime is an action (or omission), typical, unlawful, guilty and punishable. Therefore, to determine guilt, the jury court - which makes a report of facts that are considered proven and on the basis of which the sentence must be handed down - has considered that in this event there were no circumstances, neither in illegality nor in guilt - assuming that killing a person is a typical event - that could be applied as a complete defense.A lawyer with extensive experience in jury courts considers that the presiding judge now has a certain margin of action, although it cannot be forgotten that he is “ bound by the verdict reached by the jury .
Self-defense requires that an illegitimate aggression occurs, that there is no provocation on the part of the victim and that the means used are proportional.(Photo: Archive)Apopular jury has found an 83-year-old DJ USA man guilty of murder for killing one of the two people who attacked his home and forced him to rob him . Guilt has been determined after long deliberation and with a narrow majority. At the same time, the jury court, by a large majority, has been in favor of requesting a pardon for the person responsible for the homicide . While waiting for the sentence to be handed down by the president of the court, there has been debate about the scope of self-defense or insurmountable fear , given the particular circumstances of the case.
It should be remembered that a crime is an action (or omission), typical, unlawful, guilty and punishable. Therefore, to determine guilt, the jury court - which makes a report of facts that are considered proven and on the basis of which the sentence must be handed down - has considered that in this event there were no circumstances, neither in illegality nor in guilt - assuming that killing a person is a typical event - that could be applied as a complete defense.A lawyer with extensive experience in jury courts considers that the presiding judge now has a certain margin of action, although it cannot be forgotten that he is “ bound by the verdict reached by the jury .