Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 0:36:37 GMT -5
Garzón and became the new instructor of court number 5 of the national court. A month earlier, the general council of the judiciary had decided to suspend garzón from his duties, with three cases against him in the supreme court for wiretapping at the 'gürtel and two alleged crimes of prevarication. One of the first measures adopted by judge ruz was the reopening of the 'pheasán case' , whose investigation had been closed by his predecessor in office. The discovery of new evidence and the interrogations of the leadership of the ministry of the interior have turned this process into a political argument of the pp against alfredo pérez rubalcaba and josé luis rodríguez zapatero. To such an extent that some sources claimed that ruz's position could be in danger . The defenders of this hypothesis were supported by the fact that pablo ruz is on a secondment , which must be renewed six months after it was established. Since the deadlines had been met, they suggested that the government could pressure the cgpj to remove the madrid magistrate from the case .
However, as el confidencial digital has learned , the position of the instructor of the 'pheasán case' is not in any type of danger . Authoritative voices from the general council of the judiciary have explained that “ruz's appointment was exceptional Special Database and that is why exceptional measures have been taken that will allow him to remain in office .” the aforementioned sources affirm that "In the agreement reached in june it was specified that it would not be necessary to renew pablo ruz's special services after six months." the permanent commission of the cgpj decided that “ there will not be another judge number 5 of the national court until garzón is acquitted and can return .” regarding the hypothetical pressures from the government, the justice officials consulted by ecd are categorical: “ there is no doubt about the independence of the council .” furthermore, if there had been a need to renew the service commission, " it would have been carried out internally , paying special attention to compliance with deadlines in trials and the way of acting in them." the same sources maintain that “ ruz has done an impeccable job and there would not have been any type of problem.”the national president of the pp has imposed his opinion based on a personal position .
He is convinced that camps is innocent ,” sources close to mariano rajoy explain to el confidencial digital . Rajoy maintains confidence in the valencian president also for the same reason that he once defended the canarian leader josé manuel soria , who was accused of corruption and was finally acquitted . As for the principle, of 'obligatory' application in the parties, that anyone who is judicially accused (as is the case with camps) must cease from their positions, in rajoy's circle it is argued that it is not an automatic postulate , but that “ every case is every case ”. Some accusations are not the same as others, and therefore this rule cannot be applied automatically to everyone. The accusations have to be proven considering that the valencian president and popular candidate has not 'demonstrated' that he did not pay for the suits of which he is accused, because he has not presented the payment invoices , sources from the pp leadership point out that many other spaniards did not either. Could demonstrate similar purchases. But, and this is the most solid argument that rajoy uses, the underlying argument is that the one who has to present evidence is the one who accuses , and not that people have to 'prove' that they are innocent.